| St
Ed's The website of St Edmund's Parish Church Roundhay, Leeds |
![]() |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Articles - From the Vicar
In the middle of June Canon Dr Jeffrey John was nominated by the Bishop of Oxford as the new Bishop of Reading, one of the three suffragan bishoprics in the large Diocese of Oxford. His nomination made headlines not only because Dr John had openly declared his homosexual orientation but also because he had been in a same-sex relationship for nearly thirty years. In a highly unusual move nine diocesan bishops wrote an open letter to the Archbishop of Canterbury questioning the appropriateness of the appointment. A few days later, eight other diocesan bishops (including our own) wrote to the Archbishop to affirm their support for Dr. John and for the manner in which his appointment was made. On 6th July it was announced that Jeffrey John had withdrawn his acceptance of the nomination.
The debate about Dr John's appointment was heated and at times intemperate.
It was not helped by some of the media coverage which was, by turns, luridly
sensational and ill-informed. Most disturbingly there was a confusion of
the particular issue of Dr John's appointment and the wider issue of the
Christian response to homosexuality, a confusion that has not served the
Church of England well.
In December 1991 the House of Bishops published a document, Issues in Human
Sexuality which was intended as a resource document for parishes, deaneries
and dioceses. Its purpose was to promote a discussion of homosexuality within
the wider context of Christian reflection on human sexuality in general
(a discussion that Jeremy Trew helped us with here at St. Edmund's some
years ago). Drawing on the resources of scripture and the Christian tradition
the document affirmed lifelong heterosexual marriage as an ideal but also
stated clearly that those in faithful homosexual partnerships, although
falling short of this ideal, should be affirmed and welcomed by the local
church. However for homosexual clergy a 'different standard' applied and
the discipline was clear: they were required to remain celibate. In the
context of Issues in Human Sexuality the nomination of Dr John was, on the
face of it, uncontroversial: he does not live with his partner (indeed has
never lived with him) and the relationship has been a celibate one for well
over ten years. Moreover Dr John himself has written unequivocally about
his obedience to the disciplines set out in Issues in Human Sexuality: "I
have had, and still have, an overriding regard for the mind of the Church
in its interpretation of scripture, whatever my personal interpretation."
The Bishop of Oxford, as Dr John's nominator, and the Archbishop of Canterbury,
as the one who was to ordain him, appeared to have full trust and confidence
in Dr John's integrity in this matter. We must pray that those who challenged
the grounds for this trust and confidence, including some senior bishops,
did not do so lightly.
In his statement following Jeffrey John's withdrawal the Archbishop of Canterbury
spoke of the "shocking level of ignorance and hatred towards homosexual
people" that had been apparent in letters sent to him. The scandal
of such ignorance and hatred makes all the more urgent the need for debate
among Christians about homosexuality to be informed, to have perspective
and to avoid using arguments that are focused on particular individuals
such as Dr John. We must be theologically serious in our debating, recognising
the genuine disagreements that exist between us as Christians and being
willing to engage in dialogue both with each other and with our holy scripture
and tradition. But our debating must also take place with an awareness that
our fundamental calling as disciples is to proclaim Jesus Christ to the
whole of humanity, holding out to a broken world the healing and liberating
grace of the Gospel and modelling in all our relationships the faithfulness,
humility and integrity that flow from a life lived in and for Christ.
Let us pray for grace to listen as well as to speak, to understand before
we judge and in all that we do to seek the mind of Christ in union with
whom all things hold together.
|
©
St Edmund's Church, Roundhay
|